As Hillary Clinton calls for repealing the second amendment, this behind the scenes deep state puppet master epitomizes what those in favor of gun control really want — only the government can have guns.
Every time a lunatic, who is usually on some form mind-altering pharmaceutical, goes on a shooting rampage, the do-gooders in Washington, with the aid of their citizen flocks, take to the TV and the internet to call for disarming the American people.
The citizens who call for themselves and their neighbors to be disarmed, likely think no deeper than the shallow speeches given by the political blowhards, designed to appeal to emotion only. They do not think of what happens during and after the government attempts to remove guns from society. They also completely ignore the fact that criminals do not obey laws and making guns illegal would have zero effect on criminals possessing guns.
In the perfect statist world in which only the government has guns, we’re told that crime rates would plummet, people wouldn’t be murdered, gun violence would be brought to its knees, and a disarmed heaven on Earth would ensue. But how effective would disarming the citizens actually be at preventing gun violence, while at the same time keeping guns in the hands of government? Full story...
Related posts:
Every time a lunatic, who is usually on some form mind-altering pharmaceutical, goes on a shooting rampage, the do-gooders in Washington, with the aid of their citizen flocks, take to the TV and the internet to call for disarming the American people.
The citizens who call for themselves and their neighbors to be disarmed, likely think no deeper than the shallow speeches given by the political blowhards, designed to appeal to emotion only. They do not think of what happens during and after the government attempts to remove guns from society. They also completely ignore the fact that criminals do not obey laws and making guns illegal would have zero effect on criminals possessing guns.
In the perfect statist world in which only the government has guns, we’re told that crime rates would plummet, people wouldn’t be murdered, gun violence would be brought to its knees, and a disarmed heaven on Earth would ensue. But how effective would disarming the citizens actually be at preventing gun violence, while at the same time keeping guns in the hands of government? Full story...
Related posts:
- Graphic: Bodycam footage of Patrick Harmon being shot by cop...
- U.S. police killings reminiscent of lynching, UN group...
- Unarmed black pastor with hands up shot dead by cops in Oklahoma...
- Disturbing: US cops pepper spray & wrestle 84-yo grandmother to ground...
- Sheriff Zollman -- What will you tell Jack Yantis's widow?
- America’s cult of the police...
- Whom do you call when your rapist is a cop?
- Why police interrogations lead to so many false confessions...
- How police terrorise people without even arresting them...
- California police shoot and kill couple who were passed out in a car...
- US police killed 1,126 people so far this year. Will 2016 be any different?
- Killer cops are treated better than common criminals...
No comments:
Post a Comment