Sunday, September 22, 2013

The British babies made in India...

(...)

The couple finally resigned themselves to living without children – until last summer when they heard of the Akanksha Infertility Clinic, where up to 100 Indian women at any time carry the children of Western clients. Michael and Veronica quickly signed up.

More childless couples are making the same decision. Since surrogacy was first regulated in Britain in 1985, only about 50 couples a year have chosen to ask another woman to carry their child. But the rate has quadrupled in the past six years, as a growing number of older couples opt for surrogacies and new legislation permits gay men and lesbians to do so, too. Although only 203 surrogate babies were recorded in Britain last year, social workers say this understates the true figure as many couples do not apply for the parental order that grants them official status as parents.

Britain bans commercial surrogacy to prevent exploitation, meaning that surrogate mothers can only be paid expenses, such as for maternity clothes. Typically, surrogates are friends or family, or altruistic strangers kept on registers with long waiting lists.

 But more than a quarter of British couples are now bypassing the law to find surrogate mothers overseas, where they pay up to £50,000 per baby. India is the most popular country, largely because its clinics charge less than half the rate demanded in America. Full story...

Related posts:
  1. Wombs for rent: Indian surrogate mothers tell their tales...
  2. I’ve fathered 16 children but I’m still a virgin at 36...
  3. World's first test-tube baby, Louise Brown... 
  4. Shanghai sperm bank denies "helping hand" rumour!!! Hilarious!
  5. A baby made in India: American couple's dream come true...
  6. When India's poor hire out their wombs as surrogate mothers...
  7. Eggs from Europeans, sperm from wealthy Westerners and embryos implanted...

No comments:

Post a Comment