Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Even the NY Times is now rejecting Monsanto GMO science...

This isn’t a leak. It isn’t a timid flow. It’s a flood.

I’m talking about about the criticism of Monsanto’s so-called science of genetically-engineered food.

For the past 20 years, independent researchers have been attacking Monsanto science in various ways, and finally the NY Times has joined the crowd.

But it’s the way Mark Bittman, lead food columnist for the Times magazine, does it that really the crashes the whole GMO delusion. Writing in his April 2 column, “Why Do G.M.O.’s Need Protection?”, Bittman leads with this:

“Genetic engineering in agriculture has disappointed many people who once had hopes for it.”

As in: the party’s over, turn out the lights.

Bittman explains: “…genetic engineering, or, more properly, transgenic engineering – in which a gene, usually from another species of plant, bacterium or animal, is inserted into a plant in the hope of positively changing its nature – has been disappointing.” Full story...

Related posts:
  1. Why the most powerful thing in the world is a seed...
  2. The video Monsanto does not want you to see...
  3. Monsanto's monopoly on seeds in India are the root cause behind the sharp...
  4. Miracle grow: Indian farmers smash crop yield records without GMOs...
  5. Farmer suicides in India...
  6. Seeds of doubt: Brazilian farmers sue Monsanto...
  7. Monsanto guilty of chemical poisoning in France...

No comments:

Post a Comment