Sunday, February 03, 2013

Lies, damned lies, and newspaper reporting…

(...)

But worse was to come. The next day The Guardian newspaper, which historically fell out with Wikileaks, published a myopic hit-piece about the event. No mention of all the whistleblowers who attended and what they said, no mention of the award to Dr Fingar, no mention of the fact that his work saved the Iranian people from needless war.

Oh no, the entire piece focused on the tawdry allegations emanating from Sweden about Julian Assange’s extradition case. Discounting the 450 students who applauded all the speeches, discounting all the serious points raised by Julian Assange during his presentation, and discounting the speeches of all the other internationally renowned whistleblowers present that evening, The Guardian’s reporter, Amelia Hill, focused on the small demo outside the event and the only three attendees she could apparently find to criticise the fact that a platform, any platform, had been given to Assange from his political asylum at the Ecuadorian Embassy.

So this is where we arrive at the deep, really deep, hypocrisy of the evening. Amelia Hill is, I’m assuming, the same Guardian journalist who was threatened in 2011 with prosecution under the Official Secrets Act. She had allegedly been receiving leaks from the Metropol­itan Police about the on-going investigation into the News of the World phone-hacking scandal. Full story...

Related posts:
  1. How television news creates the illusion of knowledge...
  2. How the mainstream media deceives with its magic tricks...
  3. The relentless decline of the mainstream news media...
  4. How the one-sided media spins tales about the conflict in Syria...
  5. Louis Farrakhan blasts the media and reporters...
  6. The media is dead ... long live the media!

No comments:

Post a Comment