Friday, August 05, 2011

The Osama bin Laden cock and bull story, creating evidence where is none...

The New Yorker has published a story planted on Nicholas Schmidle by unidentified sources who claim to be familiar with the alleged operation that murdered Osama bin Laden.

There is no useful information in the story. Its purpose seems simply to explain away or cover up holes in the original story, principally why did the Seals murder an unarmed, unresisting Osama bin Laden whose capture would have resulted in a goldmine of terrorist information and whose show trial would have rescued the government’s crumbling 9/11 story?

The gullible Schmidle tells us: "‘There was never any question of detaining or capturing him – it wasn’t a split-second decision. No one wanted detainees,’ the special-operations officer told me." In other words, the SEALs murdered bin Laden, because the US government did not want detainees, not because trigger-happy stupid SEALs destroyed a font of terrorist information.

Why did the SEALS dump bin Laden’s body in the ocean instead of producing the evidence to a skeptical world? No real explanation, just that SEALS had done the same thing to other victims. Schmidle writes: "All along, the SEALs had planed to dump bin Laden’s corpse into the sea – a blunt way of ending the bin Laden myth." But before they did so, the US checked with an unidentified Saudi intelligence operative, who allegedly replied, "Your plan sounds like a good one."

I mean, really. More...

Don't miss:
  1. Osama bin Laden dead: is anyone telling the truth?
  2. Photos show three dead men but none look like bin Laden...
  3. Media scrambles as bin Laden story crumbles...
  4. Obama: “We could not say definitively that bin Laden was there”
  5. 'Evidence proves 9/11 story is a lie' 
  6. Become a conspiracy realist...
  7. Pakistanis turn to conspiracies...

No comments:

Post a Comment